Efficacy vs BREO across multiple endpoints

Efficacy vs BREO across
multiple endpoints

hero dots

WHY WAIT to prescribe TRELEGY for your ASTHMA patients?

WHY WAIT
to prescribe TRELEGY for your ASTHMA patients?

Better breathing for your adult patients with ASTHMA who are symptomatic on an ICS/LABA

TRELEGY is NOT for the relief of acute bronchospasm.

CAPTAIN evaluated TRELEGY vs BREO, an ICS/LABA, in a 24- to 52-week trial in adult patients with ASTHMA.1

TRELEGY FOR ASTHMA

Patients on TRELEGY experienced 5X greater lung function vs an ICS/LABA1

 
Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 241

TRELEGY 100

Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough FEV at Week 24
Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough FEV at Week 24

TRELEGY 100 demonstrated a significant 110 mL lung function improvement vs BREO 100 (P<0.001).1

Additionally, TRELEGY 200 demonstrated 2X greater lung function improvement vs BREO 200. The change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24 for TRELEGY 200 (n=408) was 168 mL vs 76 mL for BREO 200 (n=406); difference 92 mL (P<0.001).1

WHY DELAY TRELEGY TREATMENT?

  • CAPTAIN study description1

    The CAPTAIN trial was a 24- to 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of TRELEGY vs BREO in adult patients whose ASTHMA was inadequately controlled while receiving daily ICS/LABA. At screening, patients with ASTHMA (N=2436, mean age: 53 years) had a mean prebronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 of 58.5%.

  • See TRELEGY 100 vs BREO 200 data

    TRELEGY 100 compared with a high-dose ICS/LABA, BREO 200

    Descriptive results

    In the CAPTAIN study, the change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24 was 134 mL for TRELEGY 100 (n=406) vs 76 mL for BREO 200 (n=406), which was a 59 mL difference vs BREO 200.1

    59 mL difference vs BREO 200 in trough FEV at Week 24
    59 mL difference vs BREO 200 in trough FEV at Week 24

    *The comparison of TRELEGY 100 vs BREO 200 was not in the predefined testing hierarchy and the difference reflects rounding.1

TRELEGY FOR ASTHMA: Annualized rate of exacerbations

Descriptive pooled results: Exacerbations over 52 weeks1
The mean annualized rate of exacerbations was 0.31 for both TRELEGY (100 and 200; n=814) and for BREO (100 and 200; n=813), with a 2.6% reduction in rate (95% CI: -26.2, 24.9) with TRELEGY compared with BREO.

Among Patients on TRELEGY (100 and 200) or BREO (100 and 200)

Among patients on TRELEGY (100 and 200) or BREO (100 and 200), 16% reported at least one exacerbation and 84% reported no exacerbations
Among patients on TRELEGY (100 and 200) or BREO (100 and 200), 16% reported at least one exacerbation and 84% reported no exacerbations

Exacerbation defined as deterioration of ASTHMA requiring the use of systemic corticosteroid (or at least a doubling of maintenance dose) for at least 3 days, or an in-patient hospitalization or emergency department visit due to ASTHMA that required systemic corticosteroids.

This endpoint was not in the predefined testing hierarchy and results are descriptive.1

In the 1 year prior to study entry, 63% of subjects reported having exacerbations that required oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalization.1

  • CAPTAIN study description1

    The CAPTAIN trial was a 24- to 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of TRELEGY vs BREO in adult patients whose ASTHMA was inadequately controlled while receiving daily ICS/LABA. At screening, patients with ASTHMA (N=2436, mean age: 53 years) had a mean prebronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 of 58.5%.

Asthma Control Questionnaire responder rate favoring TRELEGY

The ACQ-7 incorporates 5 questions on symptoms and impacts, rescue bronchodilator use, and lung function (FEV1).2
 

Descriptive un-pooled analysis: ACQ-7 responder rates at Week 24

Descriptive un-pooled analysis: ACQ-7 responder rates at Week 24
Descriptive un-pooled analysis: ACQ-7 responder rates at Week 24

The ACQ-7 responder rate was 62% for TRELEGY 100 and 64% for TRELEGY 200 compared with 52% for BREO 100 and 58% for BREO 200 at Week 24, favoring TRELEGY.1

In a descriptive pooled analysis,§ the ACQ-7 responder rate was 63% (498/795) for TRELEGY 100 and TRELEGY 200 compared with 55% (436/793) for BREO 100 and BREO 200 at Week 24, favoring TRELEGY (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.76).1  

An ACQ responder was defined as a patient who had an ACQ total score decrease of ≥0.5 from baseline at Week 24.1  

§This endpoint was not in the predefined testing hierarchy and results are descriptive.1

  • CAPTAIN study description1

    The CAPTAIN trial was a 24- to 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of TRELEGY vs BREO in adult patients whose ASTHMA was inadequately controlled while receiving daily ICS/LABA. At screening, patients with ASTHMA (N=2436, mean age: 53 years) had a mean prebronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 of 58.5%.

  • Measuring control with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7)

    The ACQ-7 incorporates 5 questions on symptoms and impacts, rescue bronchodilator use, and lung function (FEV1 % predicted).2  

    ""
    ""

    Nighttime
    awakenings due
    to ASTHMA

    ""
    ""

    Daily activity
    limitations due
    to ASTHMA

    ""
    ""

    Wheezing
    frequency

    ""
    ""

    ASTHMA
    symptoms
    on waking

    ""
    ""

    Shortness of
    breath due to
    ASTHMA

    ""
    ""

    SABA use

    ""
    ""

    FEV1

3 Dots

 

 

 

What are TRELEGY dosing considerations for ASTHMA?

See details

 

Help your patients try TRELEGY.

Request samples now

 

You can request TRELEGY savings offers for eligible patients.

See savings offers

See the adverse reactions occurring in ≥1% of patients with ASTHMA in the CAPTAIN study.

View adverse reactions